DSM: Decentralized State Machine - Solving the "Double Spend Problem" without the need for global consensus, unlocking a new paradigm

71104:

PS: I’m not going to read your paper, it has too much information that doesn’t answer my questions. You can’t ask me to process that amount of signals and noises, I’d rather stay answerless. But it’s fair for me to publicly challenge your idea on this forum.

It’s telling that such dismissals are made from anonymous accounts, so there’s no risk of personal reputation being tied to public statements that may soon be proven embarrassingly wrong. History is full of cautionary examples:

• 
  

  “Everything that can be invented has been invented.” ~ Charles H. Duell, US Patent Office, 1899 (apocryphal, but still infamous).

  
  


• 
  

  “There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home.” ~ Ken Olsen, Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977.

  
  


• 
  

  “The horse is here to stay but the automobile is only a novelty.” ~ President of the Michigan Savings Bank, 1903.

  
  

Those who dismiss paradigm shifts without empirical refutation are remembered not for their insight, but for their shortsightedness. Anonymity only postpones accountability; it never erases it.

All you’re doing is legitimizing everything I’m posting. Every breakthrough invention in history has been met with exactly this kind of knee-jerk dismissal at first in fact, it’s practically a prerequisite for paradigm shift, as history proves time and again.