Benchmarking Blockchain Transaction Speeds: bloXroute vs. BlockRazor

Trading on BNB Smart Chain is brutally competitive. If your infrastructure lags even a few milliseconds, you lose edge. We benchmarked our mempool feed vs. BlockRazor, across two different geographic regions, to see who delivers new transactions faster.

The results show that bloXroute consistently outperforms on transaction speed and propagation efficiency. Below is an overview of our testing methodology and the results we observed:

🔍 Benchmark Methodology

Feeds Compared:

* bloXroute newTxs
* BlockRazor newTxs

Tiers Compared:

* **bloXroute Tier**: Enterprise
* **BlockRazor Tier**: Tier 2 (BlockRazor’s enterprise-equivalent based on pricing)

Test Duration: 5 intervals × 30 minutes each (2.5 hours total per location)

Measurements:

* **First-seen transaction comparison:** which provider delivered each transaction faster.
* **Latency delta per transaction:** the time differences between the same transaction arriving from each provider.
* **Full latency distribution (P10, P25, P50, P75, P90):** shows how the latency advantage is distributed across all transactions. For example, the P90 value means 90% of the latency deltas were that value or better — indicating consistent, faster performance for the vast majority of transactions. Lower percentiles (like P10) capture the biggest observed advantages, while higher percentiles (like P90) reflect consistent performance across the entire dataset.

🌍 Regions and Endpoints Tested

📊 Benchmark Results Summary

Frankfurt (Germany)

Virginia (USA)

📈 Latency Distribution

Frankfurt (Germany)

Virginia (USA)

🔍 Distribution Insights

Frankfurt:

* 42.49% of transactions were seen **≥10ms earlier** on bloXroute.
* bloXroute beat BlockRazor in all percentiles below the median.
* Only the slowest 25%–10% of cases favored BlockRazor, but by smaller margins.

Virginia:

* bloXroute received transactions **first 68% of the time**, with a **~10ms average lead**.
* Strong lead up to P50, small tail reversal beyond P75.
* Over **44%** of transactions were seen **≥10ms faster** on bloXroute.

🚀 Key Takeaways

* **bloXroute leads in both speed and consistency across regions.**
* On average, bloXroute delivers transactions **~9–10ms earlier** than BlockRazor.
* Tail-end reversals are minor and don’t impact the overall dominance in performance.
* bloXroute delivers **more transactions, faster**, with a broader coverage of first-seen data and deeper feed completeness.

🎯 Conclusion

Across both Frankfurt and Virginia regions, bloXroute’s mempool feed outperformed BlockRazor on every key performance metric. For any use case where timing is critical — from MEV strategies to real-time DeFi execution, bloXroute gives your infrastructure the edge it needs.

Want to test it yourself? Reach out for access or run your own head-to-head comparison.

**Connect with bloXroute:**

🌐 Website | 🐦 Twitter | 💼 Book a Demo

Benchmarking Blockchain Transaction Speeds: bloXroute vs. BlockRazor was originally published in bloXroute on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.