A U.S. judge overturned the fraud conviction against Avraham Eisenberg, citing that the New York prosecutor did not have a proper venue for the trial. Eisenberg was convicted of manipulation using the DeFi trading platform Mango Markets, but the judge ruled that he operated in Puerto Rico and had no direct connection to New York. As a result, two fraud charges were dismissed, and he was acquitted of a third telecommunications fraud charge. The judge noted that Eisenberg's actions did not constitute telecommunications fraud given the platform's unclear rules. Nevertheless, Eisenberg still faces four years of imprisonment for possession of child sexual abuse material. Mango Markets ceased operations earlier this year.

MNGO

A US judge has determined that New York prosecutors had no proper venue to convict Avraham Eisenberg of fraud for his exploit of DeFi trading platform Mango Markets, vacating two of his convictions and acquitting him of a third, in a notable reversal of one of the crypto industry's highest-profile exploit cases.Judge Arun Subramanian, a Biden appointee who is also notably overseeing the criminal case against rapper Sean "Diddy" Combs, ruled on Friday that the evidence in Eisenberg's trial did not determine that prosecutors in the Southern District of New York had proper venue to bring the case against Eisenberg."He didn't make trades in New York, call or email anyone in New York, or go to New York in connection with his scheme," Judge Subramanian wrote in his ruling. "There is no allegation that the Mango Markets platform had ties to New York."Judge Subramanian argued that the evidence brought by prosecutors at trial, that Eisenberg used an automated trading platform based in New York and that at least one Mango Markets user based in New York attempted a withdrawal following the exploit, did not go far enough in determining proper venue for Eisenberg, who was operating from Puerto Rico at the time of the hack. Consequently, his first two counts of fraud were vacated.Judge Subramanian acquitted Eisenberg of a third, wire-fraud charge, notably arguing that Eisenberg's behavior, manipulating an oracle in order to inflate the value of his holdings on the platform before withdrawing the funds, which Eisenberg's defense argued was a "winning" trading strategy, did not actually violate any wire fraud laws. The charge was also overturned for lack of proper venue."On a platform with no rules, instructions, or prohibitions about borrowing, the government needed more to show that Eisenberg made an implicit misrepresentation by allowing the algorithm to measure the actual value of his collateral," Judge Subramanian wrote.Now, Justice Department prosecutors will need to decide whether or not to bring an additional case against Eisenberg on the vacated convictions. Despite the overturned charges, Eisenberg still faces a sentence of four years in prison for the possession of child sexual abuse material. He was sentenced in April.“From the beginning, we said this case was fatally flawed,” Eisenberg’s attorney Brian Klein said in a statement to Bloomberg Friday. “We are very pleased for Avi that the judge granted our motion and dismissed the case.”Mango Markets ceased operations earlier this year following a tumultuous history and several legal cases.

US Judge Overturns Mango Markets Manipulation Conviction Due to Improper Trial Venue