Viewpoint: The trustworthiness and neutrality of BTC and ETH involve token distribution and transparency, jurisdictional relationships, and developers.

Odaily Planet Daily reports that former Facebook stablecoin project lead David Marcus posted on the X platform to refute 1confirmation founder Nick Tomaino's view that $ETH is not neutral. In response, Nick Tomaino stated that credible neutrality can be defined from three aspects:

1. Token distribution and transparency: $BTC has 0% internal allocation. Anyone can participate as a PoW miner and it is completely transparent. $ETH has a 10% internal allocation and previously used PoW mining. Solana's internal allocation accounts for 62%, with early token distribution and validators undisclosed, lacking overall transparency;


2. Jurisdiction relationship: Bitcoin pioneered internet-native technology. Ethereum is building internet-native technology together with a global community. Solana is more like a "corporate token," having engaged in lobbying in the United States;


3. Developer platform: Bitcoin lacks a strong developer platform. Ethereum, however, has numerous important use cases (stablecoins, DeFi, NFT, prediction markets, decentralized social networks, etc.). Ethereum prioritizes providing a decentralized platform for developers and companies. Coinbase, BlackRock, Fidelity, Stripe, Kraken, Deutsche Bank, Sony, Visa, Polymarket, Uniswap, Aave, and OpenSea are all building within the Ethereum ecosystem.