This article discusses the advantages of native rollups in L1 execution, particularly concerning gas billing issues. It points out that with the introduction of new features such as blob sharing, data availability (DA) costs can be better managed, and all native rollup calls use the same execution function, standardizing execution costs. Additionally, proof costs are included in execution costs, making the gas billing of native rollups expected to be equivalent to L1 gas billing. For non-native rollups based on decentralized sequencers, the article proposes several coping strategies, including maximizing the use of FOCIL and pre-confirmation mechanisms, filtering out underpaid transactions, and avoiding becoming native rollups.